Case Study:
EBMUD Team Focuses on Leadership and Results

 

 

Home
Corporate Profile
Services Provided
Case Studies
Work Experience
Articles / Papers
Newsletter Request

 

Services:

Up
Sacramento Regional
City of Mesa
EBMUD

East Bay Municipal Utility District’s Water Treatment Section Implements Assessment Recommendations

Four years ago EBMUD’s Water Treatment Section faced a number of significant issues.  To help the section get a handle on these issues, the district elected to participate in the Environmental Protection Agency/American Water Works Association’s Partnership for Safe Water.  The program report, completed in February, 1998, identified a number of issues, including several management and administrative concerns. In addition, there had been some grievance issues and discipline items that were difficult for the operating staff to accept.  Shortly after the partnership project’s assessment was completed, the water plant operators, traditionally one of EBMUD’s few non-union groups, voted to join the Stationary Engineers union, local 39. 

It was apparent that some definite action needed to be taken, but what?  Where to start?  Richard Sykes, Manager of Water Treatment and Distribution, identified some of the issues; “We wanted to create a more effective organization and to improve performance, consistency and employee morale.  To do that we felt we needed to develop an understanding of the personnel, union, and business operation dynamics of the Water Treatment Section.  In addition, we wanted to create more of a team based type of operation.  TAP Resource Development Group’s Organizational Culture and Leadership Alignment assessment process seemed to be just the tool we needed to create a foundation, a place to begin” said Mike Carpenter, Water Treatment Superintendent.

To develop an organization in an effective manner, it’s important to have an understanding of the character and personality – the culture – of the organization, including what the organization has done well.  In addition, understanding both how leadership works within the organization and if Leadership and Culture are aligned with the Organization’s Strategic Purpose.

The assessment process began in February, 1999 with an examination of section mission, vision, and planning information and a series of interviews with section and plant leaders.  This information assisted TAP Resource’s consultants and the section’s leadership team in identifying the section’s strategic purpose.  Next came the cultural assessment; a process designed to clearly identify in measurable, quantifiable terms the culture of the Water Treatment Section and the culture of each of the district’s five water treatment plants.  Every employee within the section was asked to participatein the cultural assessment process to insure that the base of information was as inclusive as possible. 

Also included in the project was a 360° leadership assessment.  This activity looked, in a non-judgmental way, at the leadership attributes of the section’s leadership team.  It compared those attributes with the leadership needs of the section based on its strategic purpose.  The last phase of the project was a two-day workshop in May, 1999 designed to help the leadership team understand the data, the implications of the data, develop recommendations and outline action plans for implementing the recommendations.

The assessment clearly indicated that the section’s strategic purpose is strongly one of

  • The section’s culture was a strong “In Control” culture.  This type of culture fits well with and is supportive of an “Operational Excellence” strategy.

  • The section’s core culture showed significant signs of being out of balance.

  • There was not a consistent leadership pattern.  The result was a low degree of alignment of leadership with an “Operational Excellence” strategy.  Of particular importance were the low Results and Production scores of the leadership team.

  • There was a lack of cultural consistency among the five water treatment plants and with the section’s core strategy.

  • Decision making within the section is divided between “In Control” and “Collaborative” based decision-making.

  • People Development and Promotional Practices are not well integrated with the section’s strategic purpose.

These findings were discussed in detail during the workshop and two primary recommendations were developed as a place to start:

  1. The section should implement a comprehensive Leadership Development Program for all leaders within the section.

  2. An Organizational Performance Management System (OPMS) should be developed to systematize a strong results focus and build leadership.

With its roadmap clearly in mind, the section began implementing both of the above recommendations in August, 1999. “TAP Resource’s assessment process gave us a different perspective and objectivity on strategies and how we do business, how we see ourselves as leaders and as a work unit. It helped in seeing and identifying what strategies might work to get to where we want to be with team work and improving consistency,” states Richard Sykes.  “We were able to identify strengths and weakness as individual leaders, as a leadership team and as a section, to better know where to direct our leadership improvement efforts.” Each member of the leadership team is using the information developed during the project to develop a leadership development plan for themselves.   At the same time, the section is creating an Organizational Performance Management System to formalize and strengthen their results orientation.  “With TAP Resource’s assistance, we hope to have a fully functioning Leadership Development Program and an Organizational Performance Management System completed by the end of the year.  In the near future, we would like to leverage both the OPMS and the leadership skills enhancement to other work units,” says Sykes.